Friday, March 26, 2010

Consider the source

By Nance Greggs
Consider the source
We have been told by the defenders of those who murder abortion-providers that such heinous actions are merely a heroic attempt to save lives.

We have been told by self-proclaimed Christians that torture is acceptable, and humane treatment of our enemies, real or perceived, is something Jesus himself would never condone.

We have been chastised by adulterers and pedophiles about our lack of morals and strong family values.

We have been admonished by bigots and bullies for seeking equality for those of a “different” color, religion, or sexual orientation.

We have been labeled anti-American for chaining ourselves to fences in protest of a way of life that includes endless war – by people who accepted the act of chaining a young man to a fence, beating him, and leaving him to die, in protest of his “alternate lifestyle”.

We have been called irresponsible by the so-called fiscal conservatives who have spent our nation into unprecedented debt.

We have been admonished for being mindless sheep who believe everything we hear by the fans of mindless idiots – who admonish their audience to believe everything they say.

We have been called unpatriotic for refusing to ignore the plight of our troops caused by the very people who sent them into combat ill-equipped, and who ignore their needs when they return home, wounded in body and mind.

We have been warned about lazy Welfare Queens by politicians who accept government handouts to subsidize their personal interests and family businesses.

We have been preached to by self-anointed spokesmen for Jesus about the dangers of loving our neighbor, being our brothers’ keeper, caring for the poorest among us.

We have been lectured about the Constitution by people who supported a president determined, at best, to ignore it – and, at worst, to circumvent it at every turn.

We have been told by media pundits that broadcasters who incite violence against fellow citizens are simply Americans exercising their freedom of speech – and that speaking out against an illegal war is un-American.

We have been assured by pseudo-journalists that misleading the public – by commission or omission, or presenting opinion as fact – is simply part and parcel of freedom of the press.

We have been called intellectual snobs for deigning to be informed of the facts, and being articulate enough to communicate without mangling the English language.

We have been called elitists by politicians who live in well-appointed gated communities, and have their chauffeurs drive their children to private schools, and themselves to their exclusive country clubs.

We have been scolded by diaper-clad brothel customers and public bathroom sex solicitors for our lack of sound character and moral rectitude.

We have been laughed at for our insistence that global climate change is a reality by people who insist that the earth is 6,000 years old, and dinosaurs peacefully co-existed with man.

We have been belittled by alleged upholders of the law for demanding that the law actually be upheld.

We have been laughed at by those who cling to self-imposed ignorance because we keep ourselves well informed.

We have been railed against for our “dirty tactics, lack of transparency, and underhanded dealings” by those who have used the same tactics, hidden their malfeasance, and brokered backroom deals as a matter of course for decades.

And throughout all of this, we have not resorted to violence against the government in power, nor have we threatened the lives of those who have sinned against us as a nation.

We have not murdered those who are anti-choice and called it a life-saving measure. We have not threatened the lives of the children of politicians who sent our children into a war based on lies.

We have not encouraged our spokespeople to incite those who are angry to take matters into their own hands, nor have we defended the actions of those who have.

We have not twisted the words of Christ to mean something completely contrary to their true intent. We have not used Christianity as a sword by which to rid ourselves of those we disagree with, nor a shield to hide behind when we know we are wrong, nor a banner under which to raise armies to fight for causes we know to be unjust.

We do not embrace lies when the truth is inconvenient, or fails to serve our purpose. We do not use those lies as a means to pit citizen against citizen.

We have been repeatedly called “terrorist sympathizers” – and now those who hurled that epithet are blatantly promoting domestic terrorism.

What is happening in our country at this minute is not a matter of right and left, but a matter of right and wrong. It is not the manifestation of a difference of opinion, but the end result of fomenting opinions that inevitably lead to anger and violence – and justifying that end result by labelling death threats as innocuous, isolated incidents, and the perpetrators of violence as merely well-meaning but frustrated citizens.

Now is the time – not for all good men to come to the aid of their party, but for all good men to come to the aid of their country. The lines are being drawn, and the clarion call to battle has been sounded.

Where we go from here is not a matter of one’s individual political persuasion. It is a matter of our collective adherence to the law, and our sense of purpose as a nation. And those who would attempt to persuade us otherwise are the “enemies within” – and should not only be acknowledged as such, but dealt with accordingly.

Treason is a serious allegation; it is word that should not be treated lightly nor invoked unadvisedly.

But there are traitors among us this night - and we all know who they are. And so do they. Nance Rants

Sunday, March 21, 2010


For the last several years,
Hannity and the Freedom Alliance "charity" have conducted "Freedom
Concerts" across America. They've told you that they are raising money
to pay for the college tuition of the children of fallen soldiers and to
pay severely wounded war vets. And on Friday Night, Hannity will be
honored with an award for this "Outstanding Community Service by a Radio
Talk Show Host" at Talkers Magazine's convention.

But it's all a huge scam.

In fact, less than 20%–and in two recent years, less than 7% and 4%,
respectively–of the money raised by Freedom Alliance went to these
causes, while millions of dollars went to expenses, including
consultants and apparently to ferry the Hannity posse of family and
friends in high style. And, despite Hannity's statements to the contrary
on his nationally syndicated radio show, few of the children of fallen
soldiers got more than $1,000-$2,000, with apparently none getting more
than $6,000, while Freedom Alliance appears to have spent tens of
thousands of dollars for private planes. Moreover, despite written
assurances to donors that all money raised would go directly to
scholarships for kids of the fallen heroes and not to expenses, has
begun charging expenses of nearly $500,000 to give out just over
$800,000 in scholarships.

In February 2009, a well-known conservative writer sent me this, about a
friend at FOX News:

The guy went on to tell me about Hannity's "Freedom Concerts," which
are staged across the country with the proceeds going to children of
slain soldiers. Of course, as the guy tells it, there'd be a lot
more money every concert to go to the cause if Hannity didn't
demand–and get–use of a Gulfstream 5 plane to fly him and his
family/entourage to the concerts; a "fleet" (that's the word the guy
used) of either Cadillac or Lincoln SUVs for him and his
family/entourage; and several suites at really expensive hotels for
him and his family/entourage. The promoter apparently values
Hannity's star demands at well over $200,000 per event. The source
says he heard that Oliver North pulled Hannity aside at one of the
concerts and told him that this had to stop. But that may mean that,
from now on, Hannity has to fly on a G4 instead of a G5, gets only a
few luxury SUVs, and two or three suites.

North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

I began investigating these claims, and lo and behold, I discovered that
Freedom Alliance gives very little money to the children of slain troops
to pay for college and even less to wounded troops. The stories of
injuries to troops and how much Freedom Alliance gives them–$200 for a
soldier from a poor neighborhood who lost three limbs–is heartbreaking.
Soldiers with traumatic brain injuries, severe wounds to the face from
disfiguring burns and explosions, and multiple amputations got $1,000 or
less, with only a handful of exceptions.

The tax forms available to the public for the Freedom Alliance–for the
years 2006-2008–paint a tragic story, a story of a charity that makes
gazillions and spends very little for the purposes it claims, a charity
that spends millions more on its small staff and crony consultants than
it ever gives in scholarships to the children of the fallen or severely
injured troops or in aid to the injured troops themselves. While
Hannity's Freedom Concerts take in millions, only a few hundred thousand
go to the claimed intended recipients.

Over a year ago, when I began looking into this story, I contacted both
Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance seeking comment and an accounting
for where the money went. Both declined to answer any of my questions.
Hannity refused to respond to an inquiry I sent to his personal private
e-mail address asking him about the lavish expenses described in the
e-mail above.

Freedom Alliance press secretary Alan Moore scheduled an interview for
me with Freedom Alliance president Thomas Kilgannon, who in the past
used Freedom Alliance resources to promote a book he wrote on the United
Nations. But when Moore asked me what the interview would be about and
I answered truthfully, the interview was not granted, and my calls to
him were never returned thereafter. I told him I'd be asking Mr.
Kilgannon about the expenses paid for Hannity and about the paltry
percentage of Freedom Alliance funds actually going to the kids of
fallen troops, to severely injured troops, and to anything other than
expenses, consultants, and printing. I wanted to know why Freedom
Alliance had spent $60,000 for "aviation services" in 2006.

Keep in mind that a charity is considered reputable if no more than 25%
of its revenue goes to expenses and no less than 75% of it goes to the
intended charity recipients. Given that, Freedom Alliance's balance
sheets are embarrassing in their shamelessness.

According to its *2006 tax returns*
Freedom Alliance reported revenue of $10, 822, 785, but only $397,900–or
a beyond-measly 3.68%–of that was given to the children of fallen troops
as scholarships or as aid to severely injured soldiers.

On the other hand, 62% of the money went to "expenses," including
$979,485 for "consultants" and an "advisor." Yes, consultant/advisors
got more than double what injured troops and the kids of fallen troops
got. The tax forms show that "New World Aviation" got paid $60,601 for
"air travel." Was that for Hannity's G5? Like I said, neither the
charity nor Hannity is talking. And finally, that year, Freedom Alliance
spent $1,730,816 on postage and shipping and $1,414,215 on printing, for
a total of $3,145,031, nearly half the revenue the charity spent that
year and about eight times what the injured troops and the children of
fallen ones received.

That's especially heartbreaking when you compare the hundreds of
thousands consultants got and the millions spent on printing and postage
to the outrageously small amounts given to wounded soldiers. In 2006,
Freedom Alliance gave only $1,000 to a soldier from Bay City, Michigan,
whom the charity says was in the following condition:

Face was blown up and lost sight in one eye.

And that $1,000 was relatively generous, when you consider this soldier
from Romulus, Michigan, whom Freedom Alliance only gave $200:

SM [serviceman] was involved in roadside bomb incident in Iraq,
which caused loss of both legs and left arm.

Romulus is a mostly Black Detroit suburb, which is one of the poorest
cities in Michigan and in America. Freedom Alliance gave this brave
soldier roughly $67 per limb. That's sickening.

So is the fact that this soldier, from Alexandria, Virginia, also only
got $200 from Freedom Alliance:

SM was wounded in Iraq by an IED explosion. Lost right arm and
severe shrapnel wounds to upper body and face.

Also appalling is the fact that in each year's tax returns soldiers
described as having brain trauma injuries, multiple amputated limbs, and
severe burns over most of their bodies get a few hundred bucks each from
Freedom Alliance and in almost every case, no more than $1,000.

That year, while fat-cat consultants and expenses took millions of
Freedom Alliance's money, seriously wounded troops to whom Freedom
Alliance donated received a pathetic average of $785 each and the
college student kids of the fallen got a paltry average of $2,943 toward
tuition. Yes, out of millions raised that year by Sean Hannity at his
Freedom Concerts, only $309,000 was given out in scholarships to 105
students, and only $110,703.82 was given to the wounded soldiers.

Freedom Alliance's *2007 tax returns*
aren't much better. Out of $12,459,317 it raised that year, only
$895,347–or just 7%–went to seriously wounded troops and scholarships
for fallen troops. 53% went to expenses, including $1,464,627 in postage
and $1,151,428 in printing. $604,995 went to "professional fees" and
"consultants." Out of millions paid for Freedom Concert tickets and
raised in fundraisers by Hannity listeners, only $596,500 went to
college scholarships for soldiers who died in battle, and only $299,897
went to horribly injured troops. 208 student children of the fallen got
an average of $2,868 apiece for tuition, though many got only $1,000 or
less. 382 soldiers with serious injuries got an average of $785 each.

And, again, that year, the amounts given to soldiers with such grave
injuries is despicably tiny. This soldier, from Killeen, Texas, got only
$500 from Freedom Alliance:

SM was wounded in Iraq on June 18, 2007 in Digula Province, Baquba,
Iraq. An IED exploded on the truck, he took shrapnel to the face,
which cut off a piece of his nose. Also had shrapnel in throat and
cheeks, which cut open his face and the inside of his throat.

This soldier, from Brady, Texas, also received just $500 from Freedom

While serving in Baghdad Iraq, SM was hit with an IED blast.
Sustained disfigurement, blindness, and superficial burns on face,
hearing loss to right ear, TBI, peppered shrapnel to the face and
right upper extremity.

And then, there are the *2008 Freedom Alliance tax forms*
which were signed in November 2009 and filed only recently. That year,
Freedom Alliance took in $8,781,431 in revenue and gave $1,060,275.57
total–or just 12%–to seriously wounded soldiers and for scholarships to
kids of the fallen. Remember, this is well below the 75% required to be
considered a legitimate charity. And after claiming in written letters
to donors that 100% of the money donated, via the Freedom Concerts or
otherwise, to the scholarships would go directly to the scholarships and
not to expenses, the Freedom Alliance decided to do the contrary and
charge expenses anyway–charging a whopping $436,386 to give out $802,250
in scholarships. That means that 35% of the $1,238,636–all of which was
supposed to go to scholarships for these kids of the fallen–went to
Freedom Alliance.

Freedom Alliance spent $5,375,654–or 61% of its total revenue earned in
2008–on expenses, but actually 80% of the total revenue spent and given
out for that year. That includes $1,055,791 spent on postage and
$925,392 on printing. It spent $157,041 on travel. Is this the item
that includes the money for the alleged Sean Hannity Gulfstream
flights? Like I said, neither the charity nor Hannity will answer

Meanwhile, 167 students got an average of just $4,803.89 each in
tuition. With the amount this charity raises, these kids should all be
getting a free ride paid for by Freedom Alliance.

And 299 very seriously injured soldiers got an average of just $805.21
each for very grave injuries. And the heartbreak of their stories and
the disgustingly low amount donated to them continues. This soldier,
from Laurel, MD, got just $1,000:

SM lost both legs and one arm, below elbow, due to IED blast. SM
also lost hearing in both ears on April 21, 2008.

Wow, while Sean Hannity and his friends at Freedom Alliance are paying
their crony consultants hundreds of thousands of dollars, they're giving
this soldier $200 per limb lost or rendered useless.

This soldier, from Fort Sam Houston, Texas (where my own father was
first sent when he was drafted during Vietnam), fared even worse in
Freedom Alliance's "generosity," receiving only $165:

SM is a bilateral amputee with 30% facial burns sustained during IED
blast, 31 May 2008, OEF.

Just $165 for that? Pathetic. And so very tragic.

Since Sean Hannity is always bragging about his phony "investigations"
(stuff he *just rips off from others*
and "investigative" skills, you'd think he could figure out how to read
a tax return and bother to look at Freedom Alliance's. But you would be
wrong. He has neither the skills nor the desire. He knows better and
is well aware that they waste money on him and his luxe accommodations
and travel. But this isn't about that or truly about helping the troops
and the kids of our war dead. It's about promoting himself, the same
way Angelina Jolie and Madonna get the press to film them in Africa.

To make matters worse, Hannity deliberately lied to his radio audience
about how much money was going to the kids of the fallen American
soldiers. On May 28th of last year, Hannity told his listeners, "Our
new sponsor, Boca Java, just pledged $30,000 to the Freedom Concerts.
That will provide a full one-year college scholarship for a kid of a
fallen soldier." In fact, Freedom Alliance's tax forms indicate it has
never given any student more than $6,000 in a school year, and usually
it's been far less. Many students only get $1,000, which will barely
cover anything at most colleges, today. A Boca Java spokeswoman told me
that last year was the coffee purveyor's last one sponsoring the Freedom
Concerts, as it now *donates directly to the troops, sending them free
coffee and through sales of its Brew of Bravery*

A friend of mine was one of the artists who performed in Hannity's
Freedom Concerts and was shocked when I showed him the tax forms and the
expenses. He no longer performs at the concerts because he was tired of
the egomania. Now, he's just angry. "We paid our own way and for all
of our costs and expenses to perform because we thought we were helping
the troops and their families and that all the money was going to them."

In investigating Freedom Alliance and its tax forms, I learned that the
organizations which evaluate charities are entirely worthless. Freedom
Alliance is certified as "Best in America" by the "Independent Charities
of America." It is also rated a "Four Star Charity" by "Charity
Navigator." Both of these "ratings" are posted prominently on Freedom
Alliance's website, misleading donors into believing they are donating
to a worthy cause, when in fact they are mostly donating to a black hole
of expenses. *Even Charity Navigator notes*
in its strange, illogical, and mostly inaccurate Four Star rating that
Freedom Alliance has a fund-raising "efficiency" of only nine cents on
the dollar. And, in fact, Charity Navigator's ridiculous rating formula
robotically crunches numbers in a way that considers the money spent
mostly on consultants, postage, and printing as having gone to the
wounded soldiers and kids of fallen soldiers, when in fact that's not
where it went at all. It simply can't be taken seriously.

And I'm not the only one who noticed. The *comments on Charity
Navigator's Freedom Alliance page*
are indicative that those who checked this charity's tax forms also note
the scam.

"Wonkling" wrote:

If you look at the actual 990, it breaks down its program expenses.
They actually spent more money this past year on postage than they
did over the past 4 years on scholarships. They paid 60k to an air
company, millions to consultants, marketing, fundraising. Their
actual expenditures on funds for children of killed/disabled
veterans is far less than what they paid themselves or their
consultants. Having a large capacity (4 stars) should not overshadow
a cumbersome efficiency rating (2 stars).

"Chickenbone" wrote:

Since 2003 Freedom Alliance has collected in cash $48,241,571! Since
2003 they have spent on the Wounded and Dead Veterans and their
Families $1,781,782 or .036 cents on the dollar, according to their
own IRS 990's!

Yes, Sean Hannity's Freedom Concerts are just a giant con. His gushing
lumpenconservatariat fans and listeners actually believe he's doing
good, while he travels in style around the country feeding his ego.
It's a win-win for him. But it's a lose-lose for the donors (who are
mostly hard-working, Middle Americans who want to help our troops and
their families and bought concert tickets and held other fundraisers)
and mostly a loser for the kids of the fallen troops and the troops,
themselves, who survived with very serious injuries.

You've heard the saying, "Patriotism is the last refuge of a
scoundrel." I love patriotism, but in this case, Sean Hannity's
"Freedom Concerts" and the Freedom Alliance are Exhibit A of that
saying. But they're not really patriots. Not even close. Their only
patriotism is to the faces they see in their mirrors. Hey, Sean, you're
a "Great American."

Sadly, the real great Americans–the ones who gave their lives and the
ones who survived but gave their limbs and their skin for this
country–are getting ripped off.

***** UPDATE, 03/18/10*: Just as I expected, the liars and frauds at
Freedom Alliance want to keep the gravy train going for them and their
cronies. So they've issued a "response," which doesn't refute a single
fact in here and frankly provides no hard evidence of anything . . .
because they don't have any. One of the "prominent bloggers" who posted
the phony response is Erick Erickson, a guy who supports Rand Paul and
the other 9/11 Truther Paul, and who defended *Emily, Zanotti, the
lunatic who has been stalking me for four years and who praised Muslim
death, rape, and torture threats against me and my family*
Yes, sadly, there are a growing number of anti-Semites on the right, and
Erick Erickson is one of them. And the anti-Semites are now the
defenders of this rip off of our seriously wounded troops and the kids
of our fallen heroes.

Here is my response to their extremely weak PR attempt at CYA:

In fact, the Freedom Alliance "response" doesn't answer any of the
questions I raised and goes on to lie more. They don't address why they
gave a triple amputee only $200—and in fact there are many of these
examples provided in their tax return addendum, but I only cited a few
for brevity's sake. They also lie and claim that they gave a lot more
money to charity b/c they categorize it as "program expenses." But I'm
sorry—calling $3 million in consulting fees, printing, and postage
"program expenses" doesn't change the fact that it still went to their
cronies, not to a fund and not the soldiers who only got on average less
than $900 apiece. It also doesn't change the fact that out of the money
spent (I didn't use the money they claim they raised for their
scholarship fund) the vast majority goes to those kinds of expenses.

Also, the "scholarship fund" is really a war chest for something else.
We've been at war since 2001, when we went into Afghanistan, and we're
winding down in Iraq. Unless the kids were born in 2001 or thereafter,
many of these kids are in college now and Freedom Alliance is giving
them a pittance toward their college tuition, while they continue to
build this massive war chest. With a giant multi-million dollar fund,
why aren't they giving the kids a free, complete ride to college? And
how many kids of deceased troops will there be in the future? Enough to
exhaust a multi-million dollar fund? Doubtful.

Moreover, because they hoarded millions of dollars, their returns show
the fund shrunk by several million dollars with bad investments and
market losses. That money could have put these kids through college for
the entire time. What's their excuse for the soldiers with no limbs and
with severe burns? Are they waiting for two decades from now when
technology is better? $165 for a soldier who is blind and his face blew
up? No excuse for that. Their "response" is simply a non-response and an
attempt to cover up the fraud. I will be posting more on this and on
more fraud at Freedom Alliance, in the coming days. Stay tuned.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Change is in the air

PTSD Update 38:     The Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) in Washington D.C. says the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs should let VA doctors use marijuana in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. At present VA forbids its doctors from recommending medical marijuana to veterans even in the 14 states where medical marijuana is legal. This policy is based on advice from the Drug Enforcement Administration.  According to the MPP, a 2008 study by the RAND Corporation in showed that 20% of soldiers returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan suffer from PTSD and that a 2007 study in the "Journal of Traumatic Stress" found marijuana can be an effective treatment for severe PTSD symptoms. The Marijuana Policy Project and MPP Foundation envision a nation where marijuana is legally regulated similarly to alcohol, marijuana education is honest and realistic, and treatment for problem marijuana users is non-coercive and geared toward reducing harm. Their mission is to:
 1. Increase public support for non-punitive, non-coercive marijuana policies.
 2. Identify and activate supporters of non-punitive, non-coercive marijuana policies.
 3. Change state laws to reduce or eliminate penalties for the medical and non-medical use of marijuana.
 4. Gain influence in Congress.
[Source: Ledger-Enquirer Larry Gierer article and 4 Mar 2010 +]


PTSD Update 39:     Injured servicemembers who receive morphine during trauma care are about half as likely to develop post-traumatic stress disorder as those who are not administered the drug, a Navy study has revealed.  The study found that the use of morphine directly after injury during resuscitation and early trauma care was associated with a reduced risk of PTSD, Troy Holbrook, one of the study's authors, said. The study was conducted by researchers from the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego, and was published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 14 JAN. Researchers studied 696 injured servicemembers using data compiled from the Navy-Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database, Holbrook said. Among the patients studied, 243 received a diagnosis of PTSD and 453 did not. Of the patients who received a PTSD diagnosis, 61% had been administered morphine. Among those without PTSD, 76% had received morphine. "This can be interpreted to mean that patients who receive morphine after serious injury, during acute trauma care and resuscitation, were about half as likely to develop PTSD compared to patients that did not receive morphine," Holbrook explained.

     Holbrook said more studies are needed to determine the correlation between morphine and the reduced risk of PTSD. "It may interfere with memory consolidation or alternatively may work through mitigation of severe pain, or a combination of both," she suggested. Researchers honed in on morphine based on the results of earlier studies that pointed to the drug as a "first-line" defense against PTSD development, Holbrook said. "Our data support the idea the administration of morphine for optimal control of pain and anxiety after injury may reduce the risk of PTSD," she said. These findings may not be limited to morphine, she noted, adding that other, related opiates are likely to have a similar effect. But more research is necessary "to understand the potential impact and importance of morphine use after injury and PTSD risk reduction in the future," she added. In the meantime, the study's findings will be shared with the other services. The results can be used to develop strategies for PTSD prevention after injury and also to help identify those injured servicemembers at greatest risk of developing PTSD, she said. Holbrook said she anticipates many more studies on this topic. "The findings have generated great interest among scientists and clinicians."  [Source: AFPS Elaine Wilson article 11 Mar 2010 ++]

Monday, March 08, 2010

Kucinich Amendment

Put the Kucinich Amendment back in the Health Care Bill. Let individual
states offer coverage. Make the Republicans vote against states rights.